The issue of whether a bat manufacturer had a legal duty to warn users about the obvious danger of being injured from a baseball hit with an aluminum bat was a question for the jury to determine. Jury found the bat was defective for lack of sufficient warning. Patch v. Hillerich & Bradsby Co., 2011 MT 175, 361 Mont. 241, 257 P.3d 383.
A Federal District Court held that a warning on a tie down device indicates the injury that occurred was foreseeable to the manufactuer. Dunn v. Ancra International LLC, CV 10-58-M-DWM, slip op., D. Mont., September 16, 2011. (also found at WL 4478478).